Unveiling the Reliability of the New Testament | A Conversation with Dr. Ben Shaw

In this episode, Dr. Benjamin C. F. Shaw discusses his latest book, Trustworthy: 13 Arguments for the Reliability of the New Testament, in an interview with Pastor Josh Burtram. Dr. Shaw shares his background in apologetics and his journey into studying the New Testament. The book aims to provide a concise and accessible overview of the evidence supporting the reliability of the New Testament. The 13 arguments covered in the book include textual criticism, genre, dating, authorship, historical criteria, New Testament creeds, archaeological evidence, external corroboration, internal consistency, undesigned coincidences, the criterion of embarrassment, the criterion of multiple attestation, and the criterion of dissimilarity. In this conversation, Dr. Ben Shaw discusses the reliability of the New Testament. He presents 13 arguments that support the trustworthiness of the New Testament, including the early dating of creeds, undesigned coincidences, archaeological discoveries, and the transformational impact of the New Testament. The argument of minimal facts is highlighted as a powerful case for the resurrection of Jesus. Dr. Shaw hopes this book will encourage believers to engage with scripture, provide clarity for those with questions or doubts, and challenge skeptics to consider the evidence.

Links

Key Takeaways

The New Testament has some of the best textual critical evidence for any writing in ancient history.

Understanding the genre of the New Testament helps in interpreting its contents.

The New Testament writings are dated within the first century, within the lifetime of eyewitnesses.

The authorship of the New Testament writings can be supported by historical evidence.

Historical criteria, such as multiple independent sources and embarrassing testimony, provide further support for the reliability of the New Testament.

New Testament creeds were early traditions used to pass on information in a memorable way.

Archaeological evidence, external corroboration, internal consistency, undesigned coincidences, and the criterion of embarrassment all contribute to the reliability of the New Testament.

The criterion of multiple attestation and the criterion of dissimilarity provide additional support for the historical accuracy of the New Testament. The New Testament is supported by multiple lines of evidence, including early creeds, undesigned coincidences, archaeological discoveries, and its transformational impact on individuals and society.

The minimal facts argument presents six well-evidenced facts that make alternative theories difficult to explain consistently, providing a strong case for the reliability of the New Testament.

Engaging with scripture and understanding its reliability can strengthen believers' faith, provide clarity for those with questions or doubts, and challenge skeptics to consider the evidence.

The book aims to encourage discipleship, promote the study and application of scripture, and foster fruitful conversations about the reliability of the New Testament.

Keywords

#newtestament #reliability #trustworthy #textualcriticism #genre #dating #authorship #HistoricalCriteria #NewTestamentCreeds #ArchaeologicalEvidence #ExternalCorroboration #InternalConsistency #UndesignedCoincidences #CriterionOfEmbarrassment #MultipleAttestation #CriterionOfDissimilarity #creeds #archaeologicaldiscoveries #transformation #MinimalFactsArgument #resurrection #scripture #believers #skeptics

Chapters