September 26, 2023
148,361
10,630
925
7.79%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
4:31Now PlayingThe unthinkable has finally happened, and Donald Trump has been hit with a gag order from a judge. But it isn't from any of the judges that are overseeing his criminal cases - instead it was a judge in Colorado that is going to hear arguments about whether or not Trump is eligible to be on the ballot. The judge has ordered Donald Trump not to threaten, intimidate, or otherwise harass ANYONE involved in the case, including the lawyers and the judge, which is a step further than any other judge has gone. Farron Cousins explains what happened.
Don't forget to like, comment, and share! And subscribe to stay connected!
Connect with Farron on Twitter
*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.
Well, folks, it finally happened. One of the judges overseeing a case against Donald Trump has finally done the unthinkable and slapped the former president of the United States with a very mild gag order. Now, the problem with this story is that it's not in any of the criminal cases that Donald Trump has upcoming. This was not Judge Chuck Ken. This was not Judge McBurney. This was not, uh, uh, the, the judge in New York. It wasn't Judge Cannon. So it's not in the criminal trials where these types of gag orders are clearly, desperately needed as the D O J keeps pointing out. 'cause Donald Trump is not only putting them all in danger, he's also tainting the potential jury pool. But a judge in Colorado that is going to be overseeing the lawsuit, trying to prevent Donald Trump from appearing on the ballot next year, issued the order this past weekend saying, quote, I 100% understand everybody's concerns for the parties, the lawyers, and frankly myself and my staff, based on what we've seen in other cases.
So the judge issued this protective order saying, Donald Trump, you cannot go after the parties that are suing. You cannot go after the lawyers representing these people. You can't go after me. You can't go after your, uh, my staff. You can't talk bad. You can't talk at all about anybody involved in these cases. And for the record, this also applies to the people who brought the lawsuit. Y'all can't go out there on social media and attack Donald Trump. You know? So it's both ways. It's not just picking on Donald Trump, which is actually the way it should be. The judge just says, listen, we will try this case in court, not on social media, not out there in speeches or rallies. Everybody shut up and we're gonna do this the right way, thank God. Who let, lemme tell you, this is Judge Sarah B. Wallace. So kudos to Judge Sarah B. Wallace for finally having the courage to do what all of these other judges should have done months ago.
And that is put the order on Donald Trump not letting him destroy the trial before it goes to trial. Now, the problem here, of course, is that this lawsuit that is seeking to bar Donald Trump from appearing on the ballot in Colorado based on the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment, which we all know what that is, um, it, it's, it's not going to be successful. Um, Trump himself did not definition engage in an insurrection. Um, and I know a lot of people may disagree with me on that, but when you look at the letter of the law, you have to kind of twist a lot of things
To be able to say that Trump engaged in insurrection. Now, did he provide aid or support to people who engaged in an insurrection that I fully believe he 100% did? Problem is none of those people have been charged with insurrection. So even though he gave support to those people, even just moral support defining what they did as an insurrection also becomes this herculean task. So unfortunately, I do not think that this lawsuit, which I do support it, by the way, I do support the lawsuit. Don't get me wrong. I'm just telling you from the standpoint of the law and all the ins and outs of it, it has no chance, unfortunately. But again, I'm gonna give full props to Judge Sarah B. Wallace for finally telling Donald Trump to shut the hell up. Stop attacking everybody and let the process play its safe. Uh, play, play itself out at trial. Untainted every other judge, overseeing any case involving Donald Trump needs to follow suit.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.