Jim Jordan Threatens To Subpoena Jack Smith In Latest Attempt To Save Trump
December 26, 2023
169,084
11,627
2,026
8.07%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Farron Cousins Episodes Around December 26, 2023
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
4:29Now PlayingJim Jordan Threatens To Subpoena Jack Smith In Latest Attempt To Save Trump
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelRepublican Congressman Jim Jordan is threatening to issue a subpoena to special prosecutor Jack Smith as Jordan continues to abuse his power to try to protect Donald Trump. Jordan listed a series of reasons he wants to hear from Smith, but none of them are real, actual issues that he needs answers to. Jordan should be held to account for his constant interference with this investigation, but that's likely to never happen, as Farron Cousins explains.
Listen to our videos in an audio format by subscribing to our podcast
Don't forget to like, comment, and share! And subscribe to stay connected!
Connect with Farron on Twitter
*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.
Republican Congressman Jim Jordan is once again abusing his power as the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee this time by threatening to send a subpoena to special prosecutor Jack Smith because as Jordan said in a letter to Jack Smith, um, there are significant concerns about your commitment to even handed justice. So Jim Jordan sent another letter to another prosecutor this time with the federal government, of which unfortunately Jordan does have jurisdiction. And he says, we've got some concerns about your even handedness and your pursuit of justice. You know, a lot of fun fancy words that really don't mean a thing. So basically, Jim Jordan is just saying like, I want you to come in because I'm trying to protect Donald Trump and I kind of want to imply that you've done something wrong because that's all this is. This is number one, Jim Jordan abusing his power to try to protect Donald Trump to try to slow these investigations down because they are all heating up and they're coming to trial next year.
And the second one is to try to embarrass Jack Smith on the national stage to try to impugn his credibility to try to make it appear as if he's done something improper, when in reality there's no evidence to suggest any of that. Now, I will be fair, there's actually one Trump lawyer who says that, uh, you know, the DOJ kind of pressured him into taking a plea deal. And if that's the case, you know, sure, look into it. Whatever. I actually have no problem if, uh, Jack Smith decides he wants to go and humor Jim Jordan with this, you know, possible subpoena that may or may not be coming. But here's the thing, if this were anyone else, anyone else in the country, they would be charged with obstruction of justice because let's be real. That is basically what Jim Jordan is doing. He is trying to hinder these investigations by bogging Jack Smith down with investigations of his own.
That's obstruction. Now, as I mentioned, unfortunately Jim Jordan does have that authority, so there is no way he could be charged with obstruction of justice because his actions would in fact be covered by the speech or debate clause 'cause it is directly related to his job as a lawmaker. So that's what's unfortunate about that. Like there's nothing we can do about Jim Jordan with regard to this. At least Jack Smith can't. But you know, who probably could, two people actually Alvin Bragg and Fanny Willis, because Jim Jordan has done the same thing with these people. You know, Alvin Bragg
Investigating and of course soon prosecuting Donald Trump in New York, Fannie Willis investigating, charging, and next year prosecuting Donald Trump in Georgia. He has asked these people the same thing. Uh, you better come to my committee, give me all of the materials you have because I want to see it. And both of them have responded being like, dude, you have no jurisdiction over me. Like, off that though should be considered obstruction. And because he has no jurisdiction over them, he likely would not be covered by the speech or debate clause. Now, neither brag nor Willis wants to get bogged down in another, you know, criminal proceeding against Jim Jordan. So that's probably not gonna happen, but it should. Jim Jordan is clearly abusing his power. He is throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks. And unfortunately, by targeting Jack Smith at the DOJ, Jordan does have jurisdiction there. So Smith is likely going to have to cooperate. Smith will also unfortunately have to not answer certain questions because they're related to an ongoing criminal investigation. So Jordan May get his little evil wish to try to make Jack Smith look like a fool on the national stage, but in the end, it's not gonna have any bearing on the investigations or any bearing on the outcome for Donald Trump. Jordan can do whatever the hell he wants, but Smith has played this game beautifully and Trump's gonna be the one paying the price for it at the end.
Social
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.









