Farron Cousins
Farron Cousins
@FarronBalanced·1M subscribers·7.6K videos

Lauren Boebert Gets Laughed At And Humiliated During House Hearing

Posted

July 14, 2024

Views

94,551

Likes

7,368

Comments

568

Engagement

8.39%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

Lauren Boebert had the opportunity to ask EPA administrator Michael Regan questions during a tense hearing this week, but her questions made no sense because she didn't understand what was going on. Boebert immediately got corrected by Regan, who also took a moment to laugh at her for being so painfully stupid, and moments later Democratic Congressman Dan Goldman had to take the time to explain the recent Supreme Court ruling to Boebert so that she understood things better. Farron Cousins explains what happened.

Listen to our videos in an audio format by subscribing to our podcast

Don't forget to like, comment, and share! And subscribe to stay connected!

Connect with Farron on Twitter

*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.

This past week, the House of Representatives, for some reason decided to hold a hearing where they grilled the head of the EPAA man by the name of Michael Regan. And Lauren Bobert, who of course is on this committee that got to grill. Michael Regan decided to use her time to show the country how stupid she really is and how little of an understanding she has of, you know, current events. Let me give you a little backstory before we go into this clip here. You see recently as part of their string of horrible rulings that threaten the future of the United States, the US Supreme Court overturned, uh, roughly 50 years of legal precedent by getting rid of what was known as the Chevron deference. And the Chevron deference says that when there is any ambiguity in regulations issued by the federal government agencies who issue these regulations, the agencies get the benefit of the doubt.

They get to be the ones who interpret the ambiguity. The Supreme Court decision says, Nope, y'all don't get to do that. We get to do that now. Haha, we're stealing the executive branch's power and putting it into us. So that is very dangerous, of course. But Lauren Bobert, who doesn't understand how the law works, um, seems to think that this means that the EPA can't do anything anymore. So that's what she was asking Michael Regan like, so now the EPA can't do anything, tell me all of the regulations you're repealing. Which at one point she was being so stupid, it actually caused Michael Regan to laugh at her. So if you haven't seen the clip, it is absolutely brilliant, beautiful, and wonderful. And here it is.

I'm asking about the EPA and I'm asking about your rogue bureaucrats that have enacted these unconstitutional reg regulations. Are you going to repeal them? Are you going to continue to implement them or are you going to stop altogether since it's been overturned?

Do you understand the ruling?

Do, do you understand the, of the Supreme Court?

I do. And so your question is, is Ill form no will, you're not repealing, you're not gonna stop.

You're, so you're going to unconstitutionally continue with

These. We're going to rulemakings, we're adhere to the Supreme Court and continue to. So how so,

Which, which rulemaking ours? Are you going to roll back?

We're going to adhere to the Supreme Court and continue to do our work in accordance to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court made a

Ruling. So which ones are you going to repeal?

The Supreme Court didn't tell us to repeal anything. They

Have been deemed unconstitutional.

No,

Absolutely they have. This was a huge victory.

Mr. Regan. Uh, I don't wanna spend too much time on this, um, but I would just like to clarify a few things for my colleague from Colorado. The Loper Bright ruling, uh, as you know, said that the courts should not defer to agency rulemaking if a statute is ambiguous. Mm-Hmm. And instead the courts get to determine whether or not what the statute means.

That Democrat that came on in the last part of that clip, of course, was Dan Goldman Democratic representative. And he explained like I did what the Supreme Court ruling actually means. And it doesn't mean that any current EPA regulations have to be repealed, but Lauren Bobert, when she was questioning Regan, there was like digging in like

Guests & Subjects Covered

Lauren BoebertMichael ReganDemocratic Congressman Dan GoldmanSupreme CourtFarron CousinsTwitter ThisUnited StatesUS Supreme Court

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.

Lauren Boebert Gets Laughed At And Humiliated During House Hearing · Farron Cousins · Sentinel