December 11, 2025
7,812
21
3
0.31%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
3:30Now PlayingWhile hearing oral arguments for Hamm v. Smith on Wednesday, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas asked Petitioner attorney Robert M. Overing about how he personally would handle multiple conflicting IQ test score results when determining whether or not someone should receive the death penalty.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook
Forbes Video on Twitter
Forbes Video on Instagram
More From Forbes
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.