The Following Program: Branca vs. Nate on the Pretti Shooting (Plus Updates from MN)

In this episode of The Following Program, Joe “Good Lawgic” Nierman moderates a high-stakes legal debate over the killing of Alex Pretti. Self-defense law expert Andrew Branca argues that the shooting itself was lawful, maintaining that under use-of-force standards the officers’ decision to fire can be legally justified based on what they reasonably perceived at the moment deadly force was used.

Nate The Lawyer strongly disagrees, arguing that the officers’ actions prior to the shooting created legal liability. Nate contends that escalation, tactics, and decision-making leading up to the gunfire are legally relevant and can invalidate a self-defense claim, even if the final seconds are viewed in isolation.

This discussion breaks down how courts analyze police conduct before a trigger is pulled, how pre-incident behavior affects justification, and why two legal experts can watch the same footage and reach opposite conclusions.

If time allows: updates from MN

✅ Subscribe for updates as this story continues to unfold.

👍 Like & share if you want real coverage beyond the headlines.

📣 Spread the word — this needs to be seen.

👇 Comment below — I want your take.

🔔 Subscribe for raw, unfiltered coverage.

👇 COMMENT, LIKE & SUBSCRIBE 👇

#alexprettishooting

#nateTheLawyer

#andrewbranca

#goodlawgic

#thefollowingprogram

#legaldebate

#selfdefenselaw

#policeuseofforce

#officerliability

#useofdeadlyforce

#lawyervslawyer

#controversialshooting

#bodycamanalysis

#constitutionalrights

#criminaljustice

Want to create live streams like this? Check out StreamYard