Haz Al-Din DESTROYS Jay Dyer [DEBATE]

Jay Dyer has fully submitted to me. After constantly interrupting me to the point where I could not get a SINGLE sentence in, he kicked me within minutes after realizing he was way out of his depth.

Let me just say that this is the most slimey, disgusting, dishonest, and dishonorable right winger I have ever had the displeasure of interacting with, and that's saying something. You absolutely NEED to watch the first half of the video to even know what happened. Once you see how much this disgusting scumbag did everything in his power to avoid having an honest debate with me, it will you disgust you.

Weaseling his way out of just admitting that he didn't want to debate in order to convince his terminally low IQ audience that he wasn't running from me - Jay Dyer employed virtually every dishonest tactic in the book - from hosting twitter spaces without my knowledge claiming it was 'for me,' to claiming that photo evidence of my physical unavailability to debate was 'photoshopped - and attempting to, panicked, host an impromptu debate on a night HE KNEW didn't fit my schedule.

Had I not accepted debating then and there - he would have happily claimed that I 'ran', blocked me, and never debated me again.

For anyone disappointed that I wasn't civil, just remember: All he needed to do was schedule a debate at a mutually agreed upon time. And he even insists that the debate happen on twitter space - where my mic is completely incomprehensible.

Despite all of that, I still debated him - and absolutely destroyed him - for no other reason that he interrupted every argument I tried to make - and then in the middle of me making an argument, conceded the debate to me by kicking me.

Jay Dyer then claimed, like the dishonest, satanic scumbag that he is, that my point was that 'knowledge and feeding are the same.' But obviously there's a crucial context: That they are the same INSOFAR AS RECOGNIZING THEIR RESPECTIVE EXISTENCE IS NON-METAPHYSICAL.

Obviously they refer to different things - THE POINT is neither the reality of knowledge or feeding requires metaphysics to recognize. So when he claims 'what is knowledge' (implying that recognizing knowledge is metaphysical) - I said - 'what is feeding? It's the same argument.'

But because Jay Dyer is an illiterate with an extremely low IQ, he made the fallacious and illogical leap that this means they refer to the exact same things. And the worst part? His illiterate audience somehow finds his failure at basic logic, which even public schools wouldn't permit 12 year olds to advance to the next grade for making - convincing.

Jay Dyer bows before the Khan. And alongside him, his entire audience.

THIS WAS ON KICK, FOLLOW ME THERE TO WATCH LIVE

FOLLOW ME ON RUMBLE

JOIN MY TELEGRAM

Support the show:

Visit our website: