Answering Objections to the Ontological Argument (Part 1)
January 17, 2012
115,864
2,927
3,879
5.87%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Inspiringphilosophy Episodes Around January 17, 2012
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
13:10Now PlayingAnswering Objections to the Ontological Argument (Part 1)
Segments
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelTo help support this ministry click here
There are 7 objections to the ontological argument that atheists primarily use. However, each objection is easily refuted and does not prove that maximal greatness is an impossible property. This video demonstrates that and reinforces the validity of the ontological argument.
Introducing the Ontological Argument and the refutation of the Omnipotence Paradox:
More on the Logical Problem of Evil:
More on the Problem of Imperfection:
More on Empirical Evidence Demands:
The Dutch Philosopher on the Reverse OA:
More on the Modal Perfection Argument:
Question Begging?:
Peter S Williams refutes more objections:
*If you are caught excessively commenting, insulting, or derailing then your comments will be removed. If you do not like it you can watch this video:
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.