Jay Dyer
@jaydyer·209K subscribers·1.7K videos
A Refutation of Materialism via Immateriality of the Intellect
Posted
September 3, 2019
Views
20,949
Likes
1,110
Comments
160
Engagement
6.06%
September 3, 2019
20,949
1,110
160
6.06%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
2:10:14Now PlayingPlease consider donating to my Patreon
How to Demonstrate that the Intellect is Immaterial
© Dr. Erik Sorem (Fr. Dn. Ananias Sorem)
The following argument takes advantage of a series of valid deductive syllogisms, with one conversion, and two translations of conclusion into equivalent meanings. The argument proceeds in the following steps:
1. AEE, Figure 2 Syllogism
2. Conversion
3. EIO, Figure 2 Syllogism
4. OAO, Figure 3 Syllogism
5. Translation
6. OAO Figure 3 Syllogism
7. Translation (Obversion)
8. Explanation of Materialism Thesis
9. Illustration of refutation via the Modern Square of Opposition
10. Explanation of Counter-Example
List of Unconditionally Valid Syllogistic Forms
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4
AAA EAE IAI AEE
EAE AEE AII IAI
AII EIO OAO EIO
EIO AOO EIO
The Syllogistic Arguments:
1. AEE, Figure 2
A All physical things are particulars
E No universals are particulars
E No universals are physical things
2. Conversion of Conclusion: No physical things are universals
3. EIO, Figure 2
E No physical things are universals
I Some concepts are universals
O Some concepts are not physical things
4. OAO, Figure 3
O Some concepts are not physical things
A All concepts are in the mind
O Some (things) “in the mind” are not physical things
5. Translated Conclusion: Some things in the mind are not physical
6. OAO, Figure 3
O Some things in the mind are not physical things
A All things in the mind are part of the mind
O Some part of the mind is not physical
7. Translated Conclusion (Obversion): Some part of the mind is immaterial (where immaterial means the negation of what is material/physical)
8. Materialism/Physicalism Thesis: E No part of the mind is immaterial
9. Modern Square of Opposition: the contradiction of E (No S are P) propositions is an I proposition (Some S are P)
10. Therefore, the I proposition (Some part of the mind is immaterial) refutes materialism/physicalism by way of counter-example.
Q.E.D.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
