Joe Rogan
@joerogan·20.7M subscribers·3.6K videos
Minds Founder Bill Ottman on "Sneaky" TikTok Ban
Posted
April 13, 2023
Views
540,554
Likes
7,061
Comments
1,232
Engagement
1.53%
April 13, 2023
540,554
7,061
1,232
1.53%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
14:55Now PlayingTaken from JRE #1970 w/Bill Ottman:
Government overclassifies information to hide accountability
U.S. government mimicking China's internet censorship
Restrict Act gives unelected officials unchecked power over apps
Restrict Act represents assault on free speech
Lindsey Graham endorsed legislation without reading it
Legislation contains hidden provisions affecting free speech
Government uses TikTok concerns to manipulate support for censorship
App bans are ineffective and violate free speech
Patriot Act passed without public awareness due to lack of social media
U.S. tech companies may be sharing data with China
Social media platforms banned users for statements later proven true
Social media platforms censored speech contradicting government narratives
Twitter has improved under Elon but hasn't reinstated all banned users
Thousands of users remain banned from Twitter without explanation
Elon refuses to reinstate Alex Jones while allowing Andrew Tate
Alex Jones banned for off-platform conduct, not Sandy Hook statements
Elon cited wrong reason for Alex Jones ban
Apple threatens to withdraw advertising if Alex Jones reinstated
BBC interviewer made claims about hate speech without evidence
Celebrities left Twitter due to social pressure, not actual problems
Mocking politicians is important for free speech
Banning hate speech doesn't reduce hate according to research
Increased hate speech is acceptable cost of free speech
Counter-speech is better response to bad speech than censorship
Hate speech definitions target only right-wing speech
California AB 587 uses undefined terms to mandate censorship
California prioritizes undefined hate speech over child safety
California AB 587 forces social media companies to submit censorship policies
California AB 587 imposes politically motivated compliance burden
Censorship laws don't protect democracy
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
