John E Hoover
@iamjohncullen·83.9K subscribers·663 videos
Part 2: Which Window Was Broken, When? Re-Opening the Case
Posted
November 25, 2019
Views
12,051
Likes
733
Comments
277
Engagement
8.38%
November 25, 2019
12,051
733
277
8.38%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
35:35Now PlayingWe aren't interested in opinions, we are interested in evidence.
By studying the evidence chronologically, can we figure out which window was broken when at Mandalay Bay?
We only have Josh Bitsko's camera to go by inside the room.
None of the other officer's BWC footage was released, despite a court order. Contempt of court??
Why didn't the LVMPD make ANY other BWC (Body Worn Camera) footage available from ANY other officer that was inside 32-134 / 32-135?
We think this evidence is very important.
It does NOT establish that the window in 32-135 was clearly broken at 11:35 pm. When was it broken? By whom?
In fact, we don't see 1,000+ spent brass casings, a pile of broken glass or a sledge hammer on the floor.
Is this evidence of malfeasance?
Join our supporters at Patreon dot com/iamjohncullen and for just $1 per month, you can watch the full version of all of our podcasts early. Our Patreon supporters get to see our podcasts and videos earlier than our YouTube audience.
This analysis is not news. This video is an independent journalistic research project and represents our opinion, and our opinion only.
THIS VIDEO MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL.
SUCH MATERIAL IS MADE AVAILABLE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.
THIS CONSTITUTES A 'FAIR USE' OF ANY SUCH MATERIAL AS PROVIDED FOR PURSUANT TO TITLE 17 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 106A-117 REGARDING USE OF COPYRIGHT MATERIAL.
FURTHER, ONLY SMALL PORTIONS OF EACH LISTED CREDIT ARE USED. THIS CREATOR THANKS EACH PERSONALLY IN ADVANCE.
FAIR USE NOTICE: Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. This effort here is respectfully submitted and credit is listed below. Only small portions of each listed has been used and/or we have requested permission to use in advance. Upon request verification can be submitted.
(We could be wrong, but that is unlikely.)
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
