The Lack of Science in the Scientific Consensus: The Case of the National Climate Assessment
June 7, 2013
67,765
1,235
548
2.63%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
The Heritage Foundation Episodes Around June 7, 2013
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
1:13:46Now PlayingThe Lack of Science in the Scientific Consensus: The Case of the National Climate Assessment
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelGlobal-warming alarmists continually refer to a "scientific consensus" to support drastic policy proposals. They insist on peer-reviewed publications as the standard for debate, while ignoring that standard when the standard will not support their hysterical claims. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Fourth Assessment Report had notable examples, such as Amazongate (where rain-forest sensitivity to small changes in rainfall were well publicized, but were based on a blog post from an activist website); and the widely hyped, but wildly unscientific, claims of the imminent demise of Himalayan glaciers. The federal government also publishes a climate assessment report. Patrick Michaels of Cato and Harold Doiron of the Right Climate Stuff team have analyzed the draft of the most recent National Climate Assessment and found its scientific rigor to be wanting.
Still haven’t subscribed to The Heritage Foundation on YouTube? Click here ►
Follow The Heritage Foundation on Facebook
Follow The Heritage Foundation on Twitter
Follow The Heritage Foundation on Instagram
Links & Promotions
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.