Police Audit Sets the Karen Read Case on Fire: 5 Critical Points You Need to Know

The City of Canton just released a scathing audit of its police department — and the timing couldn’t be more dramatic. This explosive report dropped on the very first day of jury selection in the Karen Read case, and while neither side has discussed using it in court yet, it could be a game-changer.

n this video, I break down five critical points from the audit and explain exactly how they could affect the case. With a clear, color-coded chart, we’ll break down the key themes of the report and explore how each side might use (or ignore) this powerful document. If you’re following the Karen Read case, this is one breakdown you don’t want to miss.

The "Independent Onsite Audit of the Town of Canton Police Department" was commissioned by the people of Canton, largely in response to the Karen Read and the Sandra Birchmore cases.

The explosive findings relate directly to the allegations that Karen Read has made in her defense. She says she is The jury deadlocked in the first Karen Read murder trial. She was accused of killing her boyfriend John O’Keefe by mowing him down with her car — maybe even intentionally. She says she was set up by corrupt law enforcement officials trying to protect their own.

O’Keefe was found dead in Canton, Massachusetts, in the front yard of Boston police officer Brian Albert. Prosecutors say Karen Read dropped him off at a party at Albert’s house and then hit O'Keefe with her car.

#Karenread #boyfriendcop #murdertrial #johnokeefe

Enjoying the content? Join us by becoming a channel member!

Venmo: @LawyerLeeW

PayPal: @LawyerLeeW

This channel was formerly known as the Harvard Lawyer Lee channel.

TWITTER: LawyerLeeW

MODERATORS:  Many thanks to marlonmaastricht, mamapinks and denisepelton, the best mods anywhere.

OUTRO: by MarlonMaastricht

WHAT I USE TO STREAMSTREAMYARD.  You can preload exhibits and video and it works for meetings as well as YouTube livestreams.  Affiliate link

All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).