Lbc
@lbcofficial·1.5M subscribers·17.3K videos
Should UK taxpayers pay for Prince Harry's security bill? | LBC debate
Posted
April 12, 2025
Views
24,891
Likes
397
Comments
631
Engagement
4.13%
April 12, 2025
24,891
397
631
4.13%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
12:29Now PlayingPrince Harry has claimed that the removal of his and Meghan's police protection was a plot to 'trap' them in the royal family.
Harry said his "worst fears have been confirmed" by secret evidence heard in a new court case.
It comes as he is challenging the dismissal of his High Court claim against the Home Office over the decision of the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) that he should receive a different degree of protection when in the UK.
He said it was "difficult to swallow" being told his and Meghan's security was being removed.
The duke previously hinted that the decision was at the heart of the rift between him and the King.
Ali Miraj and LBC callers discuss whether UK taxpayers should be footing the bill for the Prince's security.
Listen to the full show on Global Player
#alimiraj #princeharry #harryandmeghan #meghanmarkle #princeharrymeghan #spare #princeharryspare #security #royals #royalfamily #prince #kingcharles #LBC
LBC is the home of live debate around news and current affairs in the UK.
Join in the conversation and listen at
Sign up to LBC’s weekly newsletter here
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
