The Case That Created 'Separate But Equal' - Plessy v. Ferguson | F****D UP JUSTICE

Save 33% on your first Native Deodorant Pack normally $39, you’ll get it for $26! Click here and use my code LEEJA2 #AD Plessy v. Ferguson created the constitutional backing for "separate but equal" which solidified over half a century of Jim Crow laws. Let's talk about the origins of the case and the 13th and 14th Amendments!

RELATED VIDEOS:

The Worst US Supreme Court Decision in HistoryDred Scott v. Sanford | F****D UP JUSTICE,

_________________

𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗩𝗜𝗖𝗘𝗦

📸 Content Creator Sessions

𝗦𝗨𝗣𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧 𝗠𝗘

✨ Amazon Wishlist

𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗖𝗧 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗠𝗘

📷 Instagram

🤳🏻 TikTok

📧 E-mail: hello@leejamiller.com

💌 Snail Mail:

40 S 7th Street

Suite 212 # 136

Minneapolis, MN 55403

(don't forget the # 136!)

_________________

𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗗𝗨𝗖𝗧𝗦

HAIR

Prose Shampoo & Conditioner(link gets you $10 off!)

Shimmer Lights Purple Shampoo,

The Renaissance Circle by Davines,

Living Proof Dry Shampoo,

Unite Leavein Conditioner,

Hairdresser’s Invisible Oil by Bumble and Bumble,

FACE

HighlighterWatts Up by Benefit,

I absolutely swear by Murad Environment Shield VitaminC, (link gets you $15 off your purchase of $50 or more!)

Vanicream Face Wash,

Cerave Night Cream,

Neutrogena Rapid Wrinkle Repair Retinol,

MY FILMING SET UP

Music is always from Epidemic Sound,

Transcriptions by Rev.com, try.rev.com/3VTFgM

ULANZI WL1 Wide Angle Lens for Sony ZV1 Camera,

Neewer 660 LED Lights (x2), (I'm seriously obsessed with these lights they're so nice)

Shure VP83 Mic,

___________________

𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠𝗘𝗥𝗦

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE - Everything contained on this channel is meant solely for entertainment and informational purposes. Nothing herein should be considered legal advice nor does anything on this channel create an attorney-client relationship of any sort. Please seek guidance from a licensed attorney before making any legal decision.

COPYRIGHT - Any use of copyrighted content on this channel constitutes fair use pursuant to 17 U.S. Code § 107 as it is utilized for the purpose of criticism, comment, or news reporting allowed under that statute. See, e.g., Monster Communications, Inc. v. Turner Broadcasting Sys. Inc., 935 F.Supp. 490 (S.D. N.Y., 1996); SOFA Entertainment, Inc. v. Dodger Productions, Inc., No. 2:08-cv-02616 (9th Cir. Mar. 11, 2013); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 14-09041 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2015).

AFFILIATE LINKS - This description may include affiliate links that allow me to make a small profit (at no extra cost to you!) on purchases made through them. I only include links to products I genuinely recommend.