September 1, 2025
15,236
1,878
83
12.87%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
12:01Now PlayingGrand Juries supposedly indict a ham sandwich, but apparently not a salami sandwich – or at least men who throw them at uniformed federal law enforcement. In Washington, D.C. a grand jury has again refused the requests and rejected the evidence presented by federal prosecutors to indict a defendant. This rare occurrence is made all the more unprecedented by the fact that the prosecutors are repeatedly trying and failing to indict the same defendant after being rejected by the grand jury. What is going on with the D.C. grand juries? Are the prosecutors violating the Constitution’s Double Jeopardy clause? Shan Wu breaks down the legal issues arising from these cases.
Legal AF Substack
Follow Legal AF on Bluesky
Follow Michael Popok on Bluesky
Subscribe to the Legal AF by MeidasTouch podcast here
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.