September 23, 2025
102,539
8,476
402
8.66%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
13:11Now PlayingAccording to a new federal court filing in Trump’s defamation case against the Wall Street Journal in Miami, Rupert Murdoch’s paper argues that not only is the Trump–Epstein birthday card story accurate, but that Trump’s reputation for making sexist, vulgar, and disgusting comments about women — including Ivanka — is so notorious that it cannot be defamed. Popok reports on the filing and shares a theory that any settlement of the case could involve Murdoch paying money to buy into TikTok as part of the resolution.
Legal AF Substack
Follow Legal AF on Bluesky
Follow Michael Popok on Bluesky
Subscribe to the Legal AF by MeidasTouch podcast here
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.