October 25, 2025
96,208
9,514
733
10.65%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
12:18Now PlayingAttorneys Brian Kabateck and Shant Karnikian expose how the Supreme Court's shadow docket is undermining judicial transparency by issuing unsigned emergency orders with little to no explanation instead of following the traditional process involving months of briefing, oral arguments, and detailed written opinions. The hosts reveal how Trump's administration filed over 20 emergency applications in just seven months—more than Biden filed in four years—with the Court siding with Trump in 84 percent of cases through brief orders that provide no reasoning or guidance to lower courts. They detail how a New York Times survey found that 47 out of 65 federal judges—including Republican appointees—believe the Supreme Court is mishandling its emergency docket, with judges calling the orders "mystical," "a slap in the face," and comparing their relationship with the Supreme Court to "a war zone" while warning of a "judicial crisis" that undermines public
trust in the judiciary.
Kabateck LLPCall 184474CIVIL for a free case evaluation or visit us at
Legal AF Substack
Follow Legal AF on Bluesky
Follow Michael Popok on Bluesky
Subscribe to the Legal AF by MeidasTouch podcast here
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.