August 20, 2026
43,486
5,450
473
13.62%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
11:43Now PlayingDonald Trump's defamation lawsuit against the BBC has been reassigned to a new judge, and the history of how that judge came to the bench could have disturbing First Amendment implications. Confirmed earlier this summer in a party-line vote, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Kuntz refused to say who won the 2020 presidential election. That's troubling enough for a case about Trump's role in the Jan. 6th insurrection, but Kuntz lobbied for his judicial appointment while presiding over Trump's other defamation lawsuit against the Pulitzer Prize Board as a state judge. Kuntz ruled in Trump's favor. Adam Klasfeld of All Rise News breaks it down.
Become a member of Legal AF YouTube community
Become a member of the Legal AF Substack
Follow Legal AF on Bluesky
Follow Michael Popok on Bluesky
Subscribe to the Legal AF podcast feed here
Subscribe to the Intersection with Michael Popok podcast feed here
Subscribe to Unprecedented with Michael Popok and Dina Doll podcast feed here
Subscribe to Court of History with Sidney Blumenthal and Sean Wilentz podcast feed here
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.