Liberal Dan Liberal Dan Radio
Liberal Dan Liberal Dan Radio
@liberaldanradio·1.7K subscribers·2.7K videos

Fat Man Rant: Comstock Act vs Dobbs v Jackson... you can't have it both ways.

Posted

March 28, 2024

Views

25

Likes

8

Comments

1

Engagement

36.00%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

Conservatives are trying to get behind the idea that we can ban abortions via the Comstock act. But if Dobbs v Jackson is the law of the land, how can the abortion provisions in the Comstock Act be constitutional?

I also give my thoughts on standing in the Mifeprestone case.

Thoughts? Leave your comments below. Remember to comment on the video, like it, share it with your friends, and subscribe to the channel.

Tune in every Monday and Wednesday night at 8PM Centraland here on YouTube.

More ways to find me online

Support the show

Guests & Subjects Covered

Fat Man RantComstock ActThoughts LeavePM CentralYouTube More

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.

Fat Man Rant: Comstock Act vs Dobbs v Jackson... you can't have it both ways. · Liberal Dan Liberal Dan Radio · Sentinel