November 24, 2025
89,855
2,359
463
3.14%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
9:56Now PlayingDan Goldman confronts Secretary Kristi Noem after she refuses to commit to following a unanimous 9–0 Supreme Court ruling in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Goldman points out a basic constitutional fact: the executive branch does not get to decide guilt, membership in a gang, or legal status on its own. That job belongs to the courts. When Noem insists her department acted “appropriately,” Goldman reminds her that the Court ruled the exact opposite — unanimously. He presses her repeatedly to explain what steps she has taken to comply with the ruling, and she refuses to answer. Instead, she accuses Goldman of “advocating for a terrorist,” turning a constitutional question into political spin. This exchange exposes a deeper issue: the danger of an executive agency deciding it isn’t bound by judicial authority. Goldman’s message is clear — due process isn’t a suggestion. It’s the foundation of American law.
#DanGoldman #KristiNoem #DueProcess #SupremeCourt
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.