Liberty Politics
@liberty-politics·94K subscribers·8.1K videos
The Broader Consequences Of Atheist Republic's Indian Legal Battle
Posted
August 5, 2022
Views
743
Likes
39
Comments
43
Engagement
August 5, 2022
743
39
43
11.04%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
26:49Now Playing⚔️ HELP Us Defend Against Hindutva
🎨 Get our FREE Blasphemous Art EBook
💕 Support us on PayPal
🎤 Leave us a voicemail here
💖 Support us on Patreon
👨🏫 Get thousands of educational videos on Wondrium (20% off + 14Day Free)
🔓 Get NordVPN at a huge discount
📧 Subscribe to our Newsletter
📗 Download our book, "Why There Is No God" for FREE
👕 Buy Atheist Republic merch
📮 To donate by check, please make your check payable to ‘Atheist Republic’ and send it to: Atheist Republic, PO Box #69, Daly City, CA 94016
🤫 We also have crypto wallets for people who want to donate anonymously
📅 Schedule a call with Armin here
🛒 When you shop on Amazon using this link, Amazon will make a donation to Atheist Republic
🔔 Don’t forget to Subscribe to our YouTube channel
👕 We now have a discount code for Atheist Republic Tshirts
20% off exclusively for
our patrons
and our YouTube members (only works if you're a member)
🎧 Listen to our news podcast on iTunes, Stitcher or your favorite podcast app
Follow Atheist Republic
Follow Susanna (AR CEO, Ex-Christian, Ex-Catholic, Ex-Antifa)
Follow Armin Navabi (AR Founder, Ex-Muslim, Ex-Shia)
⭐ Clubhouse
#AtheistRepublic
The views and opinions expressed here are the commentators' own and do not reflect the official position of Atheist Republic.
Recently, the Atheist Republic team discussed an analysis of the court case before the Delhi High Court that involves Atheist Republic's "blasphemous" tweets. Published by Newsclick.In, the commentary examines the statements from the bench during the last hearing in March of 2022 and the legal precedents concerned. Some intriguing points included the argument that the court has not established the prima facie view that Atheist Republic's blasphemy is hate speech and that previous cases heard before Indian high courts have found that hate speech is not determined nearly by offending someone but by the denigration of the social standing of an individual via their membership in a group. The analysis also provided an excellent breakdown of why the Delhi High Court compared Atheist Republic to Trump, and it's not what you expect! The commentary concluded with the cautionary message that the court's demand that Twitter remove content like ours without a court order could be tantamount to the "Heckler's veto." You can read the full analysis here (), and make sure to check out the video covering the team's reaction to this written piece!
Source:
The Broader Consequences of Atheist Republic's Indian Legal Battle
Location: India
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
