January 20, 2023
354
21
6
7.63%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
16:03Now Playing🎨 Get our FREE Blasphemous Art
📗 Get my best selling book "Why There Is No God" for FREE
👉 Be an Atheist Republic patron on Patreon
🎤 Leave Armin a voicemail here
💕 Support Atheist Republic on PayPal
⚔️ HELP Us Defend Against Hindutva
👨🏫 Get thousands of educational videos on Wondrium (20% off + 14Day Free)
🔓 Get NordVPN at a huge discount
📧 Subscribe to our Newsletter
👕 Buy Atheist Republic merch
📮 To donate by check, please make your check payable to ‘Atheist Republic’ and send it to: Atheist Republic, PO Box #69, Daly City, CA 94016
🤫 We also have crypto wallets for people who want to donate anonymously
📅 Schedule a call with Armin here
🛒 When you shop on Amazon using this link, Amazon will make a donation to Atheist Republic
🔔 Don’t forget to Subscribe to our YouTube channel
👕 We now have a discount code for Atheist Republic Tshirts
20% off exclusively for
our patrons
and our YouTube members (only works if you're a member)
🎧 Listen to our news podcast on iTunes, Stitcher or your favorite podcast app
Follow Atheist Republic
Follow Susanna (Atheist Republic CEO, Ex-Christian, Ex-Catholic, Ex-Antifa)
Find Secular Rarity here:
Follow Armin Navabi (Atheist Republic Founder, Ex-Muslim, Ex-Shia)
⭐ Clubhouse
#AtheistRepublic
The views and opinions expressed here are the commentators' own and do not reflect the official position of Atheist Republic.
On January 5, the Muslim organization Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind moved the Supreme Court of India to challenge the constitutional validity of the anti-conversion laws of five states, claiming that it invades the privacy of an individual's personal decision to adopt another faith. The legality of the anti-conversion laws of the states of Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh was challenged in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the organization. The laws require individuals to disclose their conversion involuntarily, and the religious leader who would conduct the ceremony has to contact the local District Magistrate for prior permission. The converts are the ones who have to present the burden of proof to prove that their conversion to another faith wasn't fueled by coercion or "allurement." The petition said that "These provisions force a person to disclose his faith and thereby invade into the privacy of a person… The compulsory disclosure of one's religion in any form amounts to violation of their right to manifest his/her beliefs. Therefore, such disclosure is unconstitutional."
Source:
Muslim Group Challenges Religious Conversion Laws in Indian Supreme Court
Location: India
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.