Lonerbox
@lonerbox·134K subscribers·48 videos
Why Hasan Gets It Wrong On Ukraine
Posted
May 11, 2022
Views
436,763
Likes
22,411
Comments
4,263
Engagement
6.11%
May 11, 2022
436,763
22,411
4,263
6.11%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
46:04Now PlayingSupport me on Patreon
Time stamps
Intro - 00:00
Build up to the invasion - 02:06
Thought processes - 05:03
Part One: Who Do We Trust? - 05:58
Part Two: Is Putin Literally... - 14:30
Part Three: Ukrainian Language Laws - 23:28
Part Four: The Azov Battalion - 31:14
Part Five: Conspiracy Theory - 38:02
Conclusion: 44:00
Credits: 45:00
Hasan Reacts to How The Gravel Institute Lies To You About Ukraine by Adam Something
Pre-referendum polling on Crimea
Razumkov Centre
GfK(It's possible this is where the 67.5% figure came from. At the bottom of page 2 there's a question on referendum voting intentions and the total in favour of secession is 70.6%. It's broken up by age and the 1835 years group which was 67.5% in favour is in the first one on the table)
Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (these guys have USAID on their list of clients and they often work with the International Foundation for Electoral Systems who also take funding from USAID. I'd be interested to see how far this theory goes that USAID are managing to get fake polling results out of 3 separate institutions with none of this coming to light. Sounds like a tight operation
Post-referendum:
Post-annexation
The Killing of Reshat Ametov
Ukrainian Language Law
The Azov Battalion
The Snipers
The phone call
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
