January 24, 2020
545,303
14,046
5,431
3.57%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
16:09Now PlayingMr. Beat explains the scary India/Pakistan rivalry.
Here is the Cynical Historian's video looking at England vs. France
Subscribe to the Cynical Historian
Special thanks to Syawish from the channel Al Muqaddimah for looking over the script. Subscribe to Al Muqaddimah
#indiavspakistan #india #pakistan
Want a specific history topic covered? Your idea gets picked when you donate on Patreon
Donate on Paypal: paypal.me/mrbeat
Mr. Beat on Twitter
Mr. Beat on Facebook
Produced by Matt Beat. Music by Electric Needle Room (Mr. Beat's band). All images and video either by Matt Beat, found in the public domain, or used under fair use guidelines.
Electric Needle Room's new children's album, "Just Kidding Around:"
Special thanks to the AP Archive for footage for this video. It made a huge difference! AP Archive website
Creative Commons image credits:
Anil Kaushik
Azm Rehman
Usman
Nandanupadhyay
Sources/further reading:
India and Pakistan. Two major Asian countries. Both own nukes, and the world was scared they might actually use those nukes against each other back in 1999. Some folks are scared that might use them against each other TODAY. Holy crap. But woah...don’t click away now...I don’t mean to get you scared. Let’s go back and take a look at the history of India–Pakistan relations.
We will begin this story with the end of British Raj...aka British rule on the Indian subcontinent. Yep, the British controlled all that. But in 1947, the British Parliament granted all of it independence. But it would be tricky. It created two new dominion states: the Union of India and Dominion of Pakistan. However, there were over 500 sovereign princely states ruled by local monarchs, as well as French, Portuguese, and Omani territories on the subcontinent.
The princely states had the option to join India or Pakistan by signing the Instrument of Accession, or they could remain independent.
So why just these two new states? Why just Pakistan and India? Well it all was rooted in what is known as the two-nation theory.
The two-nation theory argued that the main unifying force for Muslims on the Indian subcontinent was their religion, not their language or ethnicity, and that they should all be together in one country. And therefore, Hindus and Muslims were two distinct nations. The Dominion of Pakistan would mainly be a Muslim state, and the Union of India would mainly be a Hindu state.
At midnight on August 15th, 1947, India and Pakistan legally came into existence. Within a period of less than 4 years, at least 14.5 million people migrated on the subcontinent. Millions of Muslims left everything they had behind to either West Pakistan or East Pakistan, which later became Bangladesh, and millions of Hindus headed the opposite direction.
It was one of the biggest and most rapid migrations in human history. And this mass migration wasn’t pretty. Hundreds of thousands did not make it. Although Hindus, Muslims, and this other religious group called the Sikhs had got along for the most part for hundreds of years, now there was an outbreak of sectarian violence, usually with Hindus and Sikhs on one side and Muslims on the other.
It’s estimated as many as 2 million people were killed after the Partition of India. It also led to a refugee crisis. Things were particularly violent in Punjab, a region in India that was the heart of the largest Sikh community in the world and bordered West Pakistan, and Bengal, a region in India that bordered East Pakistan.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.