Michael Cohen
@themichaelcohenshow·485K subscribers·1.8K videos
Ossoff Asked Hegseth One Question Four Different Ways — He Still Wouldn't Answer
Posted
July 22, 2026
Views
2,412
Likes
170
Comments
104
Engagement
July 22, 2026
2,412
170
104
11.36%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Episode Timeline
Every episode in order around the one you’re watching — click any card and the page flips straight to it.
13:34Now PlayingMichael Cohen breaks down Pete Hegseth's Senate hearing on the $87.6 billion Iran supplemental funding request — a hearing that produced some of the sharpest congressional questioning of the entire conflict. Senator Patty Murray confronted Hegseth on his "red, white and blue dome" claim about the Strait and the contradiction between his opposition to tolls and Trump's 20% toll proposal. Senator Reed called his answers gross negligence. And Jon Ossoff methodically asked Hegseth four times whether his Day 14 claim that Iran's military was "destroyed and combat ineffective" was accurate — never getting a straight yes or no. Michael explains what Hegseth should have said at every turn, why Russia and China helping Iran is obviously not something you disclose in an open hearing, and closes with Roger Marshall admitting on camera that gas prices move their polling numbers up and down.
🔔 Subscribe: youtube.com/@TheMichaelCohenShow
📩 Substack: therealmichaelcohen.substack.com
📻 Sundays at 5pm on 77 WABC — When You Know, You Know
#PeteHegseth #JohnOssoff #MichaelCohenShow #IranWar #SenatHearing #87Billion #StraitOfHormuz #RogerMarshall #GasPrices #WhenYouKnowYouKnow
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
