Mirror Now
@mirrornow·2.2M subscribers·145K videos
Should courts intervene in the matter of faith and religion? | The Urban Debate
Posted
November 14, 2019
Views
770
Likes
14
Comments
4
Engagement
November 14, 2019
770
14
4
2.34%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
44:50Now PlayingOn The Urban Debate, it's Tradition Vs Equality as the Supreme Court gave its judgement on the Sabrimala Temple case today.
Reading out a majority verdict, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said the question of whether women of all ages should be allowed into Sabarimala is part of a larger debate. Whether the Supreme Court should review its decision to end the ban on women between 10 and 50 entering Kerala's Sabarimala Temple will be taken up by a larger seven-judge bench.
A number of petitions were filed after the SC verdict in September last year sparked violent protests in Kerala. CJI remarked, "The endeavour of the petitioners was to revive debate on religion and faith."
This is about our fundamental right. We're coming forward for our right to equality & right to pray that has been given to us: Trupti Desai, Founder of Bhumata Brigade to Tanvi Shukla
#RightToPray
#SabarimalaCase #SabrimalaTemple
SUBSCRIBE NOW for more such videos ►
For More Updates ►
Like us on Facebook ►
Follow us on Twitter ►
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
