Mirror Now
@mirrornow·2.2M subscribers·145K videos
Supreme Court's Historic Judgement On Waqf Out, Key Provisions Stayed? What Did Petitioners Argue?
Posted
September 15, 2025
Views
155
Likes
1
Engagement
0.65%
September 15, 2025
155
1
0.65%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
5:01Now PlayingSupreme Court's Historic Judgement On Waqf Out, Key Provisions Stayed? What Did Petitioners Argue?
The Supreme Court refused to stall the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, but partially stayed key provisions. It struck down the five-year Muslim requirement, limited non-Muslims on Waqf Boards, and barred collectors from deciding property rights, upholding judicial authority. Petitioners argued the law discriminates against Muslims and endangers religious properties, while the Centre said boards manage secular functions. Interim orders were issued by Chief Justice BR Gavai’s bench.
.
.
.
.
#waqf #supremecourt #waqfbill #latestnews #englishnews #topnews #worldnews #waqfbillnews #supremecourtnews #waqfbill ##bjp #congress #worldnews #topnews #englishnews
SUBSCRIBE NOW |
For More Updates ►
Like us on Facebook ►
Follow us on Twitter ►
Follow us on Instagram ►
Subscribe to our other network channels:
Times Now Navbharat
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
