Misty Marris Breaks Down Comey & James Case Dismissals — What “Without Prejudice” Really Means
November 25, 2025
67
1
1.49%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Misty Marris Episodes Around November 25, 2025
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
6:49Now PlayingMisty Marris Breaks Down Comey & James Case Dismissals — What “Without Prejudice” Really Means
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelNBC News Legal Analyst Misty Marris joined Meet the Press Now to explain the major legal implications behind the dismissal of the federal cases involving James Comey and Letitia James — and why the judge ruled the indictments “void.”
Misty breaks down:
• Why the indictments were thrown out on technical grounds
• What “dismissed without prejudice” means for possible refile
• Whether Lindsay Halligan can continue serving as Acting U.S. Attorney
• How the statute of limitations complicates a potential comeback
• What this ruling means for other cases Halligan oversaw
A fast-moving legal story with major political and procedural fallout — Misty walks through what happens next.
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.