NBC News
@NBCNews·11.9M subscribers·98K videos
Supreme Court Edition, Chatrie v. United States: Can police use location data to catch suspects?
Posted
May 23, 2026
Views
80
Likes
1
Comments
1
Engagement
May 23, 2026
80
1
1
2.50%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
34:58Now PlayingPolice in Richmond, Virginia, had no leads after an armed bank robbery in 2019, so they got a “geofence” warrant — a novel type of warrant that allowed them to request Google location data from all devices that had been near the bank around the time of the crime. That data helped authorities identify Okello Chatrie, whom they arrested and charged in federal court. But Chatrie argues that the geofence warrant violated his Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Host Laura Jarrett speaks with the ACLU’s Nathan Freed Wessler, who won the precedent-setting case Carpenter v. United States about whether the police’s use of digital dragnets is consistent with the Fourth Amendment.
For more context and news coverage of the most important stories of our day, click here
» Subscribe to NBC News
» Subscribe to Here's the Scoop podcast
» NBC News App
» Breaking News Alerts
» Visit NBCNews.Com
» Find NBC News on Facebook
» Follow NBC News on Twitter
» Follow NBC News on Instagram
#SupremeCourt #Podcast #Police
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
