May 15, 2025
1,422
30
17
3.31%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
3:29Now PlayingSupreme Court justices on Thursday struggled over how best to restrict lower court judges from issuing sweeping nationwide injunctions as they heard arguments over the Trump administration’s bid to lift a block on the president’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship. NY Post politics reporter Ryan King shares this story.
In a session lasting two and a half hours, the justices largely skipped debating the merits of Trump’s Day One action, which would end the practice of automatically recognizing US-born children of illegal immigrants as citizens, and instead examined whether a single federal judge could or should be allowed to block such orders from taking effect.
A group of 22 states had sued the Trump administration over the executive order, and the president’s team was hit with three injunctions issued by federal judges in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state.
Read more at
#donaldtrump #supremecourt #citizenship
The New York Post is your source for breaking news, news about New York, sports, business, entertainment, opinion, real estate, culture, fashion, and more.
Subscribe to New York Post Sports
Catch the latest news here
Follow The New York Post on:
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.