New York Times Podcasts
@NYTPodcasts·503K subscribers·3.1K videos
Ending Roe Was Supposed to Reduce Abortions. It Didn’t.
Posted
November 29, 2023
Views
6,775
Likes
104
Comments
83
Engagement
November 29, 2023
6,775
104
83
2.76%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
22:09Now PlayingFrom the moment that Roe v. Wade was overturned, the question was just how much the change would reduce abortions across the United States. Now, more than a year later, the numbers are in.
Margot Sanger-Katz, who writes about health care for The Upshot, explains why the results are not what anyone had expected.
GuestMargot SangerKatz () , a domestic correspondent for The New York Times.
Background reading:
• The first estimate of births since Dobbs found that almost a quarter of women () who would have gotten abortions in states that banned it carried their pregnancies to term.
• The first fullyear census of U.S. abortion providers showed significant increases in abortion () in states where it’s legal.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily () . Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts () or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
