New York Times Podcasts
@NYTPodcasts·503K subscribers·3.1K videos
The Fishermen Who Could End Federal Regulation as We Know It
Posted
January 19, 2024
Views
9,627
Likes
88
Comments
15
Engagement
January 19, 2024
9,627
88
15
1.07%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
26:44Now PlayingOn its surface, the case before the Supreme Court — a dispute brought by fishing crews objecting to a government fee — appears to be routine.
But, as Adam Liptak, who covers the court for The Times explains, the decision could transform how every industry in the United States is regulated.
GuestAdam Liptak () , a Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times.
Background reading:
• How a fight over a fishing regulation () could help tear down the administrative state.
• The case is part of a longgame effort () to sap regulation of business.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily () . Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts () or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
