November 9, 2023
5,057
88
12
1.98%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
26:50Now PlayingA critical gun case was argued before the Supreme Court this week. But instead of opening further freedoms for gun owners — as the court, with its conservative supermajority, did in a blockbuster decision last year — justices seemed ready to rule that the government may disarm people under restraining orders for domestic violence.
Adam Liptak, who covers the Supreme Court for The Times, explains why.
GuestAdam Liptak () , who covers the Supreme Court for The New York Times and writes Sidebar, a column on legal developments.
Background reading:
• The Supreme Court seemed likely to uphold a law () disarming domestic abusers.
• But a decision on the case is not expected until June () .
• What has the Supreme Court said on guns? ()
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily () . Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts () or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.