New York Times Podcasts
@NYTPodcasts·503K subscribers·3.1K videos
The Supreme Court vs. Andy Warhol
Posted
May 23, 2023
Views
3,987
Likes
38
Comments
1
Engagement
0.98%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelA few days ago, the Supreme Court tried to answer a question that has long bedeviled the world of art: When is borrowing from an earlier artist an act of inspiration, and when is it theft?
Adam Liptak, who covers the court for The Times, explains a case that could change how art is made.
GuestAdam Liptak () , who covers the United States Supreme Court for The New York Times.
Background reading:
• The Supreme Court justices considered whether the artist Andy Warhol was free to use () elements of a rock photographer’s portrait of the musician Prince.
• The case could change the future of Western art () and, in a sense, its history, too.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily () . Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts () or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.
Links & Promotions
Guests & Subjects Covered
Supreme CourtAdam LiptakThe TimesGuest Adam LiptakUnited States Supreme CourtThe Supreme CourtAndy WarholApple Podcasts
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.