The Walz-Vance Debate: Civility and Then a Clash

Posted

October 2, 2024

Views

33,321

Likes

387

Comments

133

Engagement

1.56%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

Just three weeks after Kamala Harris and Donald J. Trump engaged in a fiery and often hostile presidential debate, their running mates, Tim Walz and JD Vance, met for their own face-off — and struck a very different chord.

Reid J. Epstein, a politics reporter for The Times, explains why this debate was so different and what it could mean for the race.

GuestReid J. Epstein () , a politics reporter for The New York Times.

Background reading:

• Read coverage of the debate () .

• AnalysisMr. Vance strained to sell a softer image () of Mr. Trump.

For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily () . Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts () or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.

Guests & Subjects Covered

The Walz-Vance DebateKamala HarrisDonald J TrumpTim WalzJD VanceReid J EpsteinThe TimesGuest Reid J Epstein

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.

The Walz-Vance Debate: Civility and Then a Clash · New York Times Podcasts · Sentinel