Trump’s Case for Total Immunity

Posted

January 10, 2024

Views

11,389

Likes

171

Comments

43

Engagement

1.88%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

Donald Trump has consistently argued that as a former president, he is immune from being charged with a crime for things he did while he was in office.

Adam Liptak, who covers the Supreme Court for The Times, explains what happened when Trump’s lawyers made that case in federal court, whether the claim has any chance of being accepted — and why Trump may win something valuable either way.

GuestAdam Liptak () , a Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times.

Background reading:

• Trump’s immunity claim in court () .

• Analysis() Trump says his acquittal by the Senate in his second impeachment trial () makes him immune from prosecution.

For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily () . Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts () or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.

Guests & Subjects Covered

Donald TrumpAdam LiptakSupreme CourtThe TimesGuest Adam LiptakApple PodcastsSpotify YouThe New York Times

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.

Trump’s Case for Total Immunity · New York Times Podcasts · Sentinel