Nprs Planet Money
Nprs Planet Money
@planetmoney·84.8K subscribers·350 videos

Should NATO be pay-to-protect? | The Indicator

Posted

May 13, 2026

Views

532

Likes

12

Comments

1

Engagement

2.44%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

NATO was formed after World War 2 as a collective security alliance that would prevent future world wars. But President Trump sees NATO more like a transaction between countries where allies have to pay up or be left undefended. On today’s episode: How NATO is actually funded, why this longstanding alliance is under strain, and how the U.S. could pay the cost for these frayed relationships.

Fact checking by Sierra Juarez () .

Your Next Listen

— Europe's NATO members take an economic hit

() Connect with The Indicator

Sign up for the Indicator’s brand new newsletter ()

Find our socials, newsletter, YouTube and more () !

For sponsorfree episodes, subscribe to PlanetMoney+ ()

See pcm.adswizz.com () for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.

NPR Privacy Policy ()

Guests & Subjects Covered

World WarBut President TrumpHow NATOSierra JuarezYour Next ListenEurope's NATOThe IndicatorNPR Privacy Policy

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.

Should NATO be pay-to-protect? | The Indicator · Nprs Planet Money · Sentinel