Open to Debate
@opentodebate·282K subscribers·1.7K videos
Major Reductions In Carbon Emissions Are Not Worth The Money || Part III
Posted
January 25, 2009
Views
3,056
Likes
8
Comments
5
Engagement
0.43%
January 25, 2009
3,056
8
5
0.43%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
7:03Now PlayingThe goal of IQ2 US is to raise the level of public discourse on our most challenging issues. To provide a new forum for intelligent discussion, grounded in facts and informed by reasoned analysis. To transcend the toxically emotional and the reflexively ideological. To encourage recognition that the opposing side has intellectually respectable views. To engage the live audience as active participants who will ask questions and decide which speakers have carried the day by voting on the motions both before and after the debate.
For: Peter Huber
For: Bjorn Lomborg
For: Phillip Stott
Against: L. Hunter Lovins
Against: Oliver Tickell
Against: Adam Werbach
===================================
Official site: iq2us.org/vote
IQ2US Twitter
IQ2US Facebook
===================================
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
