Open to Debate
@opentodebate·282K subscribers·1.7K videos
Part IIII || The FDA's Caution is Hazardous to our Health
Posted
May 15, 2013
Views
250
Likes
1
Engagement
0.40%
May 15, 2013
250
1
0.40%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
10:08Now PlayingThe Food and Drug Administration, the oldest comprehensive consumer protection agency in the U.S. federal government, is charged with protecting the public health. Under this mandate, it regulates drugs and medical devices for their safety and effectiveness. But is it a failing mandate? It's long been argued that the FDA's long and costly approval processes stifle innovation and keep life-changing treatments from the market. But the question remains: when it comes to public health, is it ever okay to sacrifice safety for speed?
For the Motion: Dr. Scott Gottlieb
For The Motion: Peter Huber
Against The Motion: Dr. David Challoner
Against The Motion: Dr. Jerry Avorn
===================================
Main Debate
Official site: iq2us.org/vote
IQ2US Twitter
IQ2US Facebook
===================================
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
