The World Is Safer Without the JCPOA || Debate #2
September 19, 2019
15,450
139
113
1.63%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Open to Debate Episodes Around September 19, 2019
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
23:15Now PlayingThe World Is Safer Without the JCPOA || Debate #2
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelThe Trump administration's decision to pull the United States out of the JCPOA, colloquially called the Iran nuclear deal, has received mixed reviews. Some say Iran wasn’t really complying with the terms and that the deal gave too much away from the outset with the easing of sanctions. Others disagree, saying the multilateral agreement was the global community’s best shot at curbing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Which side is right? Is the world safer without the JCPOA?
Michael Doran - Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute & Fmr. Sr. Director, National Security Council
Reuel Marc Gerecht - Senior Fellow, The Foundation for Defense of Democracies & Fmr. CIA Case Officer
Bernard Haykel - Professor of Near Eastern Studies, Princeton University
Brett McGurk - Fmr. Special Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS
Barbara Slavin - Director, The Future of Iran Initiative, The Atlantic Council
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.