Will DNA testing have implications on social policy? || Debate Clip
November 14, 2019
378
8
2.12%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Open to Debate Episodes Around November 14, 2019
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
2:19Now PlayingWill DNA testing have implications on social policy? || Debate Clip
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelPanelists share concerns about how parents will use information from DNA testing. Therapist Ann Pleshette Murphy explains that there are dangerous policy implications when we “educate the best and forget the rest” based on DNA data. Robert Plomin of King’s College says that DNA testing can help identify kids with a propensity to struggle. An excerpt from the debate "Parenting Is Overrated."
FOR THE MOTION:
Robert Plomin - Professor of Behavioral Genetics, King’s College London
Nancy Segal - Professor of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton & Director, Twin Studies Center
AGAINST THE MOTION:
Paige Harden - Psychology Professor, University of Texas
Ann Pleshette Murphy - Author & Parenting Expert
===================================
Cast Your Vote
Official site
IQ2US Twitter
IQ2US Facebook
===================================
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.