The Electoral College: Divisive or Unifying? || Debate Clip
June 1, 2020
649
9
2
1.69%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Open to Debate Episodes Around June 1, 2020
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
2:33Now PlayingThe Electoral College: Divisive or Unifying? || Debate Clip
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelAn excerpt from the debate "The Electoral College Has Outlived Its Usefulness."
This debate is presented in partnership with the Northwestern Pritzker School of Law as part of the Newt and Jo Minow Debate Series.
FOR THE MOTION:
Jamelle Bouie - Columnist, New York Times
Kate Shaw - Law Professor & Supreme Court Contributor, ABC News
AGAINST THE MOTION
Tara Ross - Author, "Why We Need the Electoral College"
Bradley A. Smith - Law Professor & Former Chairman, Federal Election Commission
===================================
Cast Your Vote
Official site
IQ2US Twitter
IQ2US Facebook
=================================== New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie argues that despite its neutral origins, the Electoral College quickly evolved, favoring partisanship and divisiveness. Tara Ross, author and Electoral College scholar, offers a different perspective, noting that this election process supports coalition building, and has ultimately united the country during its most challenging periods.
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.