Debate: Should Prosecutors Pursue Minor Crimes?
July 7, 2023
856
23
10
3.86%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Open to Debate Episodes Around July 7, 2023
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
49:21Now PlayingDebate: Should Prosecutors Pursue Minor Crimes?
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelIn the United States, around 13 million misdemeanor cases are filed each year, which makes up about 80% of all cases that are processed. The district attorney’s offices in areas like Suffolk County, Massachusetts, and Manhattan have implemented new policies stating they would no longer prosecute certain low-level, nonviolent crimes —such as drug possession, disorderly conduct, shoplifting, prostitution, and certain other offenses — as long as they did not accompany felonies. The reasoning given is while ¾ of nonviolent misdemeanor cases don’t turn into convictions, this still permanently affects the person’s criminal record, job prospects, and ability to secure housing and these consequences are especially felt by people of color, people experiencing poverty, and LGBTQ people. Yet, those who argue “yes” to prosecuting minor crimes say it has important societal benefits. They argue that it is an essential way of keeping our communities safe and that not strengthening sentencing will let violent criminals back onto the street, fail to protect crime victims, and increase crime rates in cities. Those who argue “no” say it doesn’t work to deter criminals or to decrease the chance of committing other crimes, and it distracts from better solutions like rehabilitation or community service. They also point to recent studies that suggest prosecuting minor crimes, especially those from first-time offenders, actually increases crime.
Arguing Yes: John Milhiser, former US attorney for the Central District of Illinois
Arguing No: Paul Butler, former federal prosecutor at the U.S. Department of Justice
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Additional Debates to Watch:
Think TwiceThe Idaho Four Tragedy with Vicky Ward
#opentodebate #debate #communitysafety #justicedepartment #Prosecution #minorconduct #legalsystem #minorcrimes #civilrights #responsibleprosecutors #rights #progressiveprosecutors
===================================
Official site
Open to Debate Apple Podcasts
Open to Debate Spotify Podcasts
===================================
-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat"
-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.









