Is the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Netanyahu Justified?
September 13, 2024
42,969
551
923
3.43%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Open to Debate Episodes Around September 13, 2024
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
55:12Now PlayingIs the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Netanyahu Justified?
Segments
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelThe International Criminal Court (ICC) is tasked with prosecuting individuals for the most serious offenses, such as genocide and war crimes. The ICC recently requested arrest warrants for Hamas’s leaders, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant for various crimes in the ongoing Israel-Hamas War. In Netanyahu’s case, he is accused of multiple war crimes and crimes against humanity, including the starvation of civilians as a weapon of war and “intentionally directing attacks against a civilian population.” Although Israel is not a signatory to the ICC, as Palestine is, the international legal implications still affect Netanyahu by limiting where he can travel and risking arrest if he visits a country or Western ally that is an ICC signatory. But some officials and many others question the fairness of equating his actions, which are intended to protect his country, with those of Hamas. Those who believe the warrant isn’t justified argue that the ICC doesn’t have legal jurisdiction over Israeli citizens and claim the warrant is politically motivated. Those who agree with the ICC argue that it’s a necessary step in enforcing international law, ensuring accountability, and helping provide justice to victims.
With this context, we debate the question: Is the ICC’s Warrant Against Netanyahu Justified?
Arguing Yes: Kenneth Roth, Former Executive Director of Human Rights Watch; Professor at the Princeton School of International Affairs
Arguing No: Eugene Kontorovich, Law Professor at George Mason University; Executive Director of Scalia Law School’s Center for the Middle East and International Law
Xenia Wickett, Geopolitical strategist, moderator at Wickett Advisory, and Trustee of Transparency International UK, is the guest moderator.
#OpentoDebate #debate #Netanyahu #Ukraine #Putin #ICC #warcrimes #jurisdiction #Gaza #GazaStrip #Palestine #Lebanon #Israel #Kenya #JoeBiden #Hamas #TwoStateSolution #antisemitisim #ADL
Additional Middle East Debates to Watch:
Are UN Aid Efforts in Israel, Gaza & Lebanon Working?
Should Israel Strike Iran?
Can Israel Make Peace with Hamas?
Can America and Its Allies Tolerate A Nuclear Iran, or Is It Time to Stop Them Now?
Is the TwoState Solution Still Viable?
UnresolvedThe Iran Threat
===================================
Official site
Open to Debate Apple Podcasts
Open to Debate Spotify Podcasts
===================================
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.