Politicon
@politicon·481K subscribers·4K videos
How We Would Cross-Examine Todd Blanche At His Confirmation Hearing | #SistersInLaw Podcast
Posted
July 13, 2026
Views
5,471
Likes
645
Comments
49
Engagement
July 13, 2026
5,471
645
49
12.69%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
28:39Now Playing#SistersInLaw criticize Blanche for undermining DOJ independence, acting as Trump’s personal lawyer, and purging career officials who worked on Trump or J6 cases
Key topics:
The historical principles of DOJ independence established after Watergate
The alleged politicization of the DOJ under Trump, illustrated by recent appointments and actions
Critical questions senators should ask Todd Blanche regarding his past decisions and ethical considerations
The significance of forensic-style questioning and the risks of misleading answers
The impact of recent firing of career prosecutors and the ongoing weaponization narratives
The importance of judicial and procedural norms, including conflicts of interest and recusal responsibilities
Freshen up your spring wardrobe! Get the ReSIStance T-Shirt, Mini Tote, and other #SistersInLaw gear!
Mentioned By The #Sisters
Order Barb’s new book, The Fix.
Get tickets for Barb’s book tour!
Fact Sheet on Todd Blanche’s Devastating Leadership at the Justice Department
Photo Of Joyce & Barb With Obama
WEBSITE & TRANSCRIPT
Email:
SISTERSINLAW@POLITICON.COM
Get text updates from #SistersInLaw and Politicon:
Timestamps:
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
