🔴 Prof Jo LIVE: Kouri Richins Trial — Strongest Evidence & Post-Verdict Moves
March 18, 2026
18,798
1,674
342
10.72%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Prof Jo Explains Episodes Around March 18, 2026
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
1:31:35Now Playing🔴 Prof Jo LIVE: Kouri Richins Trial — Strongest Evidence & Post-Verdict Moves
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelThe verdict is in for State of Utah v. Kouri Richins — now what does it actually mean?
Subscribe 👉🏻 / @profjoexplains
Become a Proffer! Join My Channel Membership 👉🏻 / @profjoexplains
Join Prof Jo live as we break down the verdict, the key evidence that likely influenced the jury, and the legal road ahead. From the prosecution’s strategy to the defense’s biggest challenges, we’re unpacking how this case got to this moment — and what comes next.
⚖️ Special Guest: Eric Faddis
Joining the stream is criminal defense attorney Eric Faddis, a nationally recognized legal analyst and former prosecutor who frequently appears on major news networks to break down high-profile criminal cases. Eric brings both prosecutorial and defense-side insight to complex trials and will help unpack the legal significance of the verdict and what may happen next.
Learn more about Eric and his work
Was the outcome expected?
Which pieces of evidence mattered most?
And what are the next legal steps following the verdict?
Prof Jo cuts through the noise with clear, straightforward legal analysis so you can fully understand the impact of today’s decision.
⚖️ In this stream:
• Full verdict breakdown
• Key evidence that shaped the outcome
• Jury decision — what stood out
• What happens next (sentencing, possible appeals, timeline)
• Special guest insights from criminal defense attorney Eric Faddis
• Live Q&A with the community
Jump in the chat and share your thoughts — was justice served?
Disclaimer:
The legal analysis and commentary provided in this program are for information and educational purposes only. The opinions expressed by the host and participants are not legal advice, nor are they intended to guide or influence any viewer’s legal decisions, strategies, or actions. Laws vary by jurisdiction, and the facts of every case are unique; past legal outcomes do not guarantee similar results in future cases.
Before acting on any legal topic discussed on Prof Jo Explains, evaluate its relevance to your specific circumstances and consider consulting a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. The criminal cases, trials, and investigations discussed on this program may involve allegations, evolving information, and matters of public record. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
The discussions on this program may include descriptions of violent crimes, legal disputes, and sensitive subject matter that may not be appropriate for all listeners. Listener discretion is advised.
Nothing in this communication is a recommendation to pursue or avoid any legal action, nor is it an offer of legal services. The host and production team make no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the information presented and assume no liability for any actions taken or not taken based on this content.
Links & Promotions
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.









