Lock Public OUT. Appeal EVERYTHING. Delay & Delay.
June 12, 2026
1,268
173
16
14.91%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Prof Jo Explains Episodes Around June 12, 2026
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
1:07:20Now PlayingLock Public OUT. Appeal EVERYTHING. Delay & Delay.
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelA live legal analysis discussion examining today’s key hearing in the Tyler Robinson case, where defense attorneys and prosecutors continue battling over public access, media coverage, and allegations of misconduct as the high-profile Charlie Kirk murder case moves toward a preliminary hearing. Robinson’s defense is seeking sanctions against prosecutors over public comments about evidence, while prosecutors argue they were responding to misleading claims made outside the courtroom. The court is also weighing issues that could impact the timing and transparency of future proceedings.
👉🏻 Subscribe to Prof Jo Explains: / @profjoexplains
🏆 Become a Proffer! Join My Channel Membership 👉🏻 / @profjoexplains
☕️ Buy Me a Coffee
Learn more about special guest Greg Skordas here:
Greg Skordas
LIVE TODAY at [TIME] EDT
Joining Prof. Jo is attorney Greg Skordas, a veteran Utah lawyer with nearly four decades of experience in criminal law. Skordas has served as a public defender, prosecutor, and private defense attorney, including leadership roles in major criminal prosecutions and special victims cases. He brings extensive courtroom experience and insight into high-profile criminal litigation.
Topics for discussion include:
Today's arguments regarding alleged prosecutorial misconduct and contempt claims
Ongoing disputes over cameras and media access in court
The status of Robinson’s efforts to delay proceedings
What today's hearing could mean for the upcoming preliminary hearing
Key legal issues that may shape the path toward trial
This is an active criminal case. Commentary is educational and observational, based only on information presented in court and publicly available filings.
add prof jos normal disclaimer at bottom
A live legal analysis discussion examining today’s key hearing in the Tyler Robinson case, where defense attorneys and prosecutors continue battling over public access, media coverage, and allegations of misconduct as the high-profile Charlie Kirk murder case moves toward a preliminary hearing. Robinson’s defense is seeking sanctions against prosecutors over public comments about evidence, while prosecutors argue they were responding to misleading claims made outside the courtroom. The court is also weighing issues that could impact the timing and transparency of future proceedings.
👉🏻 Subscribe to Prof Jo Explains: / @profjoexplains
🏆 Become a Proffer! Join My Channel Membership 👉🏻 / @profjoexplains
☕️ Buy Me a Coffee
Learn more about special guest Greg Skordas here:
Joining Prof. Jo is attorney Greg Skordas, a veteran Utah lawyer with nearly four decades of experience in criminal law. Skordas has served as a public defender, prosecutor, and private defense attorney, including leadership roles in major criminal prosecutions and special victims cases. He brings extensive courtroom experience and insight into high-profile criminal litigation.
Topics for discussion include:
Today's arguments regarding alleged prosecutorial misconduct and contempt claims
Ongoing disputes over cameras and media access in court
The status of Robinson’s efforts to delay proceedings
What today's hearing could mean for the upcoming preliminary hearing
Key legal issues that may shape the path toward trial
This livestream follows the Tyler Robinson case as today's hearing unfolds. Prof. Jo provides calm, legally grounded commentary to help viewers understand what’s happening, why it matters, and how the legal arguments fit into the broader case — without theatrics or speculation.
What you'll get in this livestream:
Live hearing coverage and analysis
Plain-English legal context for motions, rulings, and arguments
Explanation of courtroom procedure and strategy
Clear separation between facts, arguments, and analysis
This is an active criminal case. Commentary is educational and observational, based only on evidence presented in court and publicly available information. All defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law. Opinions expressed are for educational purposes and should not be considered legal advice.
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.