Rationality Rules
Rationality Rules
@rationalityrules·613K subscribers·444 videos

Kalam Debate: @CapturingChristianity vs. @rationalityrules - Cam's Second Rebuttal

Posted

January 6, 2021

Views

21,930

Likes

782

Comments

932

Engagement

7.82%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

Chapters

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

Welcome to my Second Rebuttal in my debate against Rationality Rules on the Kalam Cosmological Argument.

DESCRIPTION #1:

Playlist of all videos in our debate

DESCRIPTION #2:

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Britannica Encyclopedia

Philosophy Basics

Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Encyclopedia[dot]com

Oxford Reference

DESCRIPTION #3:

More thoughts on scientism/empiricism

DESCRIPTION #4:

All 3 of Stephen's examples are compatible with an eternal past and hence don't imply Causal Finitism.

DESCRIPTION #5:

The sequence of natural numbers in ascending order goes like {1, 2, 3, 4...} but you obviously can't reverse the order to have a "first" element precisely because there is no "last" element. The sequence of natural numbers is an actual infinite, like the set of all past years in an infinite past. The reason that the sequence of natural numbers can't be reversed has nothing to do with it being a potential infinite, in part because it's not a potential infinite.

DESCRIPTION #6:

For more on Inductive Generalization

DESCRIPTION #7:

We have more than 5 senses

Many thanks to the following people for providing helpful comments on earlier drafts of the script: Josh Rasmussen, Justin Mooney, Wade A. Tisthammer (aka Maverick Christian), Liz Jackson, Andrew Moon, & Joe Schmid.

Special thanks to Juan Tejada for his help animating this video! You're really talented, bro!

Minor corrections: At 4:51, premise (6) should read "finitism," not "fininitism." This correction applies to future iterations. At 12:09, premises (4) and (5) should read (4*) and (5*) respectively.

-------------------------------- GIVING --------------------------------

Patreon (monthly giving)

Become a CC Member on YouTube

Onetime Donations

Special thanks to all of my supporters for your continued support as I transition into full-time ministry with Capturing Christianity! You guys and gals have no idea how much you mean to me.

---------------------------------- LINKS ----------------------------------

Free Christian Apologetics Resources

The Ultimate List of Apologetics Terms for Beginners (with explanations)

---------------------------------- SOCIAL ----------------------------------

--------------------------------- MY GEAR ----------------------------------

I get a lot of questions about what gear I use, so here's a list of everything I have for streaming and recording. The links below are affiliate (thank you for clicking on them!).

Camera (Nikon Z6)

Lens (Nikon 35mm f/1.4G)

HDMI Adapter (Cam Link 4K)

Microphone (Shure SM7B)

Audio Interface (midiplus Studio 2)

Lights (Neewer 660's with softboxes)

Color Back Lighting (Hue Smart Lights)

--------------------------------- CONTACT ---------------------------------

#Kalam #Debate #God

Guests & Subjects Covered

Cam's Second RebuttalKalam DebateSecond RebuttalKalam Cosmological Argument DESCRIPTIONStanford EncyclopediaCausal Finitism DESCRIPTIONInductive Generalization DESCRIPTIONIntroduction Section

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.