How South Park Saved Fair Use
December 17, 2015
70,751
1,227
87
1.86%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
ReasonTV Episodes Around December 17, 2015
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
4:05Now PlayingHow South Park Saved Fair Use
YouTube Description
as posted by the channel'What, What (in the Butt)' set legal precedent protecting free speech rights.
Subscribe: goo.gl/NqjoWI
"I hope that the law students today are having to watch Butters sing 'What, What (in the Butt)' in their classrooms. I hope that’s the legacy in this case," says Parker Higgins, director of copyright activism at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).
For 19 seasons South Park has provided cutting cultural commentary centered around the foul-mouthed adventures of fourth graders Stan, Kyle, Kenny and Cartman.
And while it’s a cartoon for adults, the raunchy animated show has helped establish an important legal entertainment precedent that expands free speech rights.
"When anybody creates anything basically that thing automatically gets copyrighted and for the most part it can’t be used in certain ways without permission," states Higgins. "But there are some really important exceptions to that rule and there are some really important places where we say actually members of the public no matter who they are can use this thing for all sorts of reasons without getting permission."
In 2010, EFF became unlikely allies with media giant Viacom—the owner of South Park—who was sued by Brownmark Films after a 2008 episode called "Canada on Strike" parodied a popular viral video by musician Samwell.
The case eventually made its way to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals where the judges ruled in favor of South Park and Viacom. The ruling has become an important one in entertainment law because it says that a fair use lawsuit can be stopped before going to trial—which can help content creators avoid the huge costs of litigation brought on by frivolous copyright lawsuits.
Eriq Gardner at the Hollywood Reporter notes that the 'What, What (in the Butt)' case has been the most cited in courtrooms across the country in the last five years thanks to the growth of digital content.
"Under the Supreme Court this is the highest precedent that you can have—that this Butters video is fair use," Higgins says. "The thing that’s a little less fun is the fact it can stop lawsuits early. Anything that takes any of those threats off the table—especially at the circuit level—is going to be important for the legal system and for the rights of creators."
Approximately 4 minutes.
Produced by Alexis Garcia. Camera by Alex Manning. Music by Gunnar Olsen and Audionautix.
Click for downloadable versions. Subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube channel for daily content like this.
Links & Promotions
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.









